During class on Wednesday, Professor Langholz asked us if we would use IQ tests in our classrooms, and if we would use the results to separate our class into groups based on intelligence level.
After reading chapter four, which was about intelligence and learner differences, my answer to Professor Langholz's question is no, I would not use IQ tests in my classroom. I feel that if I did use IQ tests, I would unfairly separate and label my students, especially if I looked at the results before I even met them. I want each of my students to be on an equal playing field when they come to school. I don't want to already have John or Jane labeled as "not as smart as the others" because of one score on one test.
Another reason I would not use IQ tests is that I don't believe we can accurately measure intelligence when we don't even know what intelligence is. The book states that groups of psychologists have met to discuss intelligence, but they have never agreed upon a solid definition or the structure of intelligence. The book also gives many examples of proposed types of intelligence, such as fluid intelligence, crystallized intelligence, the theory of multiple intelligences, and the triarchic theory of successful intelligence. I don't think that we should test students on something that we can't even define.
A note on the lecture - I really enjoyed this role playing activity. It made No Child Left Behind real and interesting, instead of just something we read about in the book. The activity gave us a chance to experience the effects of No Child Left Behind before we become teachers. It really made me realize that when I am considering implementing a new activity for my students (such as a mandatory concert or new grading system) I need to think of all the different points of view first.
No comments:
Post a Comment