In class today, we discussed zero tolerance policies.
We specifically talked about how Prior Lake's zero tolerance policy in the year 2001-2002 wasn't doing what it was supposed to: end school violence. I am concerned that the presentation influenced the class to have a negative attitude of zero tolerance policies. We need to keep in mind that we were given information on ONE school's policy and it's implementation during ONE school year.
I do agree with the opinion that the zero tolerance policy was not being properly applied in the Prior Lake High School during 2001-2002. For example, I don't think that the 7th grader should have been suspended for carrying scissors into the hallway. But then again, we might not know the whole truth behind the situation. The author's description is only one version of the story.
I think that zero tolerance policies are a great asset for schools to have, but they must be properly applied. The teachers and administrators should know how the policy works and how to implement it in the school. The rules need to be clear on what applies to the zero tolerance rule - ie a squirt gun. The students need to know that it is not acceptable, no matter the circumstances, to bring a weapon to school. A zero tolerance policy is a good way for the students to get the message that weapons are not allowed on school property.
Education Needs New Ideas
13 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment